What's new

Lawsuit over "Jesus pencils"

liltaz

Chief Talker
PF Member
Messages
2,225
Highlights
0
Reaction score
0
Points
402
I was reading through 1010 wins (an all news radio station) website and found this. I find it absolutely ridiculous. I think the separation of church and state has been taken WAY too far. It's been taken out of proportion and made to be something keeping anything religious at all out of schools. I don't think this is what the writers of the constitution meant when they wrote about separation of church and state at all.

Lawsuit filed over NJ boy's "Jesus pencils"
May 17, 2000 at 05:41:16

EGG HARBOR TOWNSHIP, N.J. (AP) -- A national advocacy group has sued on behalf of a 5-year-old boy who was barred from giving classmates pencils with the inscription "Jesus loves the little children."

The Rutherford Institute, a Charlottesville, Va.-based advocacy group that gets involved in religion-related disputes, filed a lawsuit May 2 against the Board of Education over a pair of 1998 incidents involving 5-year-old Daniel Walz.

Walz, a pre-kindergarten student at H. Russell Swift School, handed out the pencils to classmates in April 1998 as gifts. But a teacher confiscated them.

In December 1998, school officials banned Walz from handing out candy canes with a religious message at his class holiday party.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Camden, says he was discriminated against for his religious beliefs and that the Board of Education violated its own freedom of religion policy by silencing Walz.

"Daniel shouldn't have his right to share things with other children infringed," said Steven Aden, litigation counsel for The Rutherford Institute.

Board of Education lawyer Joe Betley declined comment on the lawsuit, saying the board had not yet been served with it.

Walz is now a 7-year-old first grader at the school.
 
I do understand that. Like you said, it would be the other kids' perogative to say no. They're little kids. They're not going to be influenced by a little pencil. They'll write with it. I think teachers are so worried about lawsuits over everything that they don't think about whether they're going too far.

It's good to have another point of view from someone who's not Christian.
 
I'm agnostic, so I'm undecided and open to alot.. and I feel that this kid was doing nothing wrong at all. I can't belive that the government is being so ANAL!! sheesh! Man, if you walked down the street screaming out, "JESUS RULES ALL!!!"... then that would be going to far, but this...

------------------
"Gecko-In-A-Can... It's mmmm-mmmm good!"
 
Being an athiest, and someone harshly opposed to organized religion, I would be very offended on a personal level to have been handed one of these pencils by this child.

Having said that, there's no reason whatsoever that this child shouldn't be allowed to hand them out or give them as gifts. It's the perogative of the other children to refuse them.
IMO, everyone is entitled to their own beliefs and faith, and is free to share those views with others, so long as it's not in a prohibitive or aggressive fasion.

I agree that the BoE went WAY beyond their limits against this child, and his rights were 100% violated. It's not their job to limit religious expression. If the parents of the other children were opposed to his actions, it's THEIR job to talk to their child and explain the situation, not the BoE's.


------------------
From another BBS:
"hmm... Cyrix III, huh? You can put syrup on sh*t, but that don't make it pancakes."
 
If you walk down the street yelling "Jesus rules all," you are protected by the First Amendment.

It's just too **** bad that the Board of (Re)Education doesn't agree with the Bill of Rights.

Ski Bum
 
You are presenting a 1 sided hypocritical argument. If i wanted to promote the heritage of my aryan ancestors and pass out neo-nazi literature you would be appaled. You cannot say that 1 cult is any better than another. In high school these religious groups wanted to hold meetings on school property. We didn't mind that as much as they wouldn't let any OTHER cults hold discussions. We made up a name "NFA" Neo-Fascist Alliance as a joke and said we wanted to meet after school on school property as well. Since they wouldn't let us they couldn't say yes to anyone else. Problem solved.
smile.gif
 
Rainfall,

This forum doesn't thread like a <good> newsreader, so I'm just guessing that you were replying to me. If that's not the case, my apologies.

You are presenting a 1 sided hypocritical argument. If i wanted to promote the heritage of my aryan ancestors and pass out neo-nazi literature you would be appaled. You cannot say that 1 cult is any better than another. In high school these religious groups wanted to hold meetings on school property. We didn't mind that as much as they wouldn't let any OTHER cults hold discussions. We made up a name "NFA" Neo-Fascist Alliance as a joke and said we wanted to meet after school on school property as well. Since they wouldn't let us they couldn't say yes to anyone else. Problem solved.

More name calling... (sigh)

Look, there is NOTHING hypocritical about the First Amendment. Absolutely NOTHING.

I am not being hypocritical as I couldn't care less what literature you hand out. I don't care if you came from Mars (now that's appropriate on Alien Soup), and I don't care if you believe in Catholicism, Baptism, Communism, Fascism, Scientology, or even Cosmology. Whatever you hand out is fine with me as I am just as free to ignore you, debate you, or take your pamphlet and use if for toilet paper if I so desire.
smile.gif


Ski Bum

[Edited by Ski Bum @ June 04, 2000 (edited 1 time)]
 
If you were referring to me I don't see where I present a one-sided hypocritical argument.

No one ever said anything about any other goups. I never said "but if it were those terrible neo-nazis it'd be a different story". I think YOU assumed that we might think that.
 
It is strictly inherent in your argument that you felt it was OK. There is no such thing as Objective reporting. Because the fact that the item is even reported at all makes it subjective. It's quite the paradox, but true however. You can argue all you want but it will fall upon deaf ears.
 
Originally posted by RainFall:
It is strictly inherent in your argument that you felt it was OK. There is no such thing as Objective reporting. Because the fact that the item is even reported at all makes it subjective. It's quite the paradox, but true however. You can argue all you want but it will fall upon deaf ears.

LMAO. Evidently, Rainfall likes his head in the sand, and proves that his mind is closed.

As far as I'm concerned, you and anyone else is free to say whatever the hell you want to say. I'm just as free to ignore you as you claim that you'll do to me.

Boy, do I have a deal on a class in reading comprehension and writing skills for you...
smile.gif


Ski Bum
 
Back
Top