Wisconsin Bill Claims Single Moms Cause Child Abuse by Not Being Married

littlebuffalo

Part Of The Furniture
PF Member
In Wisconsin, a state senator has introduced a bill aimed at penalizing single mothers by calling their unmarried status a contributing factor in child abuse and neglect.

Senate Bill 507, introduced by Republican Senator Glenn Grothman, moves to amend existing state law by "requiring the Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention Board to emphasize nonmarital parenthood as a contributing factor to child abuse and neglect."

The bill would require educational and public awareness campaigns held by the board to emphasize that not being married is abusive and neglectful of children, and to underscore "the role of fathers in the primary prevention of child abuse and neglect."

Saying that people "make fun of old-fashioned families," Grothman -- who has never been married and has no children -- criticized social workers for not agreeing that children should only be raised by two married biological parents, and told a state Senate committee that he hopes the Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention board, of which he's a member, could "publicize something that's politically incorrect but has to be said in our society."

"Whether that leads to more people paying attention and having children after they're married or whether that leads to some others making a choice for adoptions," he said.

A third of all parents in Wisconsin are single. Given that single mothers far outnumber single fathers in the state and in the rest of the country, and given the emphasis on fathers being part of the solution rather than part of the problem, many people feel that the bill is tantamount to an attack on single moms.

At Tuesday's meeting of the state Senate Committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue, lawmakers and members of the public spoke out against the proposal.

"This bill is going to do nothing to help children avoid abuse. It's going to do nothing to help families," Democratic state Representative Chris Taylor said at the meeting. "What this bill does is call out and chastise women who have babies who are unmarried."

Grothman has advanced and supported other policies "that make it harder to access prevention-based health services so that they can prevent pregnancy, so that they're not in a situations here they have an unintended or unwanted pregnancy," Taylor added.

Grothman is also the sponsor of Wisconsin State Bill 202, which would repeal the state's Equal Pay Enforcement Act. Last year he claimed in an essay that the "Left and the social welfare establishment want children born out of wedlock because they are far more likely to be dependent on the government."

In "How The United States and The State of Wisconsin Are Working to Encourage Single Motherhood and Discouraging Children in 2-Parent Families," he wrote that the government urges women not to get married by making programs like low-income housing assistance, school choice, WIC, tax credits, and food stamps more attractive than marriage.

His solution? Restrict the types of foods that can be purchased with food stamps, make Section 8 housing more cramped and limit the value of assets owned living there to $2,000, and eliminate school choice, among other things. "It is inexcusable that a single mother making $15,000 gets her kid out of the Milwaukee Public Schools but a married couple earning $50,000 is stuck in the public schools," he wrote. "It is also somewhat outrageous that some married couples feel they can only afford one or two children in part because they are paying excessive taxes to provide programs for someone else to have four or five children.

Edward Kuharski of Madison, Wisconsin, spoke out against the bill, calling it "off target."

"I don't understand a bill that's just about stating an opinion," he said, "and that appears to be the entire purpose of this bill, simply to assert an opinion and impose it upon an expert body that knows perfectly well how to do its business."

"Senator Grothman has no experience in parenting," Kuharski pointed out. "The contribution of institutional increase in neglect and abuse of children … has nothing to do with what you learned in Sunday school. Nothing. Before you put a larger target on the back of the people that you have attacked through many other bills, stop and take some responsibility for it."

http://shine.yahoo.com/parenting/wisconsin-bill-claims-single-moms-cause-child-abuse-011200419.html
 
I live in WI............I didn't read the thread but I can tell you that I would prolly be in a mental place if I didn't have a DH. :lol:
 
I'm not surprised in the least, he's a known extremist. He is against equal pay for equal work, against MLK day, against **** adopting, against sex ed in school, against lead paint regulations...
 
i'm a single WI mom, 32, was 16 when i got knocked up and 17 when i had my son, now 15. my son is supportive, polite, involved in football, tennis, track, weight lifting, has a 3.5, is in accelerated classes and has been since 6th grade, goes to camp matawa (YMCA camp, wants to be a counselor, will be taking courses over the next few summers to complete that), plays video games and has a good group of friends (thankfully not too much into girls yet, i know cuz i stalk his phone and facebook page, he doesn't need to know that tho). not bragging just proving a point. is it hard? heck yeah. are there days when he has to deal with PMS mommy? heck yeah. i give a crap about my kid and i am a helicopter parent and he gets flustered by that sometimes and we fight but in the end he knows that he is NUMBER 1 and will always be. would it be easier with a hubby yeah BUT what if me and that hubby fought all the time and he was drunk and abusive to me then what? what is my son seeing/learning? this guy is a TOOL!! i hope someone eggs him walking down the street!!!!! thnx for reading, there is ALWAYS an exception to the "rule". single parents don't = abusive parents :ranting:
 
And how many kids that come from two parent households are abused or grow up being neglected? wtf?
 
His solution? Restrict the types of foods that can be purchased with food stamps, make Section 8 housing more cramped and limit the value of assets owned living there to $2,000, and eliminate school choice, among other things. "It is inexcusable that a single mother making $15,000 gets her kid out of the Milwaukee Public Schools but a married couple earning $50,000 is stuck in the public schools," he wrote.


These points of his I can agree with. There are women (in WI and every other state) who have children for income production. It happens. Making that lifestyle less attractive is OK with me. The rest of his babble is crap.

This guy is part of the reason I don't understand why extreme Repubs are against the Obamacare free contraception. As soon as it's free, then they can mandate it. They are so not forward-thinkers.

:lol:
 
This guy is part of the reason I don't understand why extreme Repubs are against the Obamacare free contraception.
Easy--they oppose everything Obama does--even the conservative stuff-- which happens to be a significant amount of his doings...........he's both a secret muslim and a secret republican. the horror!
 
my direct next door neighbors who lived in a habitat for humanity home had all their daughters make babies by their boyfriends of the time as soon as they were able to. bam bam bam . they laughed about it, seeing as how the state would be taking care of them. i know a lot of folks of this mindset. the system needs a good fixing. and all morals were out the window in that family. sooo.............................................there needs to be a balance. i do think that punishing the flagrant procreators by having them suffer substandard living conditions in ill housing will only exacerbate the situation. it would have to be an intense education of a different mindset and this will never ever happen in this society. there is too much "who are you to tell me!?" mentality worldwide, and until an acceptable government that is trustworthy, motivated by love of fellow man, and is 100 percent reliable is established, it will never, ever get better. but until that day, education is paramount.
 
my direct next door neighbors who lived in a habitat for humanity home had all their daughters make babies by their boyfriends of the time as soon as they were able to. bam bam bam . they laughed about it, seeing as how the state would be taking care of them. i know a lot of folks of this mindset. the system needs a good fixing. and all morals were out the window in that family. sooo.............................................there needs to be a balance. i do think that punishing the flagrant procreators by having them suffer substandard living conditions in ill housing will only exacerbate the situation. it would have to be an intense education of a different mindset and this will never ever happen in this society. there is too much "who are you to tell me!?" mentality worldwide, and until an acceptable government that is trustworthy, motivated by love of fellow man, and is 100 percent reliable is established, it will never, ever get better. but until that day, education is paramount.

:eek: :faint:
 
Back
Top