Muslim Terrorists are Claiming They Have a Nuclear Weapon!

C

chimaybliss

New Talker
PF Member
“We have a nuclear bomb ready to be fired at a moment’s notice.” “America and its allies need to leave all Muslim nations at once or this nuclear bomb will be used and millions will perish at the hands of the evil infidels.” This is what several news outlets are reporting throughout multiple Middle Eastern countries during the past week. The statements are coming from a group of Muslim Extremists who have not identified themselves by name yet.

http://socyberty.com/issues/muslim-terrorists-claim-they-have-acquired-a-nuclear-bomb
 
Terrorists having a nuclear bomb as a missle does them no good. Remember these people attack as cowards. This does them no good when they like to attack in stealth. We would know exactly Where to strike back. If they get themselves a suitcase nuke then be really scared.
 
I wonder what this statement means:

and millions will perish at the hands of the evil infidels.
Click to expand...

So this would be a bomb exploded by the West? Onto itself? Or was it a mistranslation?

---------- Post added at 02:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:53 AM ----------
ssvs04 said:
If they get themselves a suitcase nuke then be really scared.
Click to expand...

I always wondered what became of the Russian "Red Mercury" project ...
 
I don't know what the hell do USA and Europe invading Irak Afghanistan..
Are not stay inte age of empires to are invading other countries and of course can't wait that the ppl of this countries defender their country
The "terrorist" only is the legitimate resistance of this countries
For USA Osama Bin Laden was not a terrorist when the CIA trained him and other "terrorist" to win at the USSR in the sovietic invasion of afghanistan,stupidly USA think that the talibans figh against the USSR because hate USSR and love USA :lol:

I want that the news is false and the "terrorist" haven't a bomb but if really have the bomb and atack a city the blume is of USA and Europe for are ivading other countries
 
Enza said:
I don't know what the hell do USA and Europe invading Irak Afghanistan..
Are not stay inte age of empires to are invading other countries and of course can't wait that the ppl of this countries defender their country
The "terrorist" only is the legitimate resistance of this countries
For USA Osama Bin Laden was not a terrorist when the CIA trained him and other "terrorist" to win at the USSR in the sovietic invasion of afghanistan,stupidly USA think that the talibans figh against the USSR because hate USSR and love USA :lol:

I want that the news is false and the "terrorist" haven't a bomb but if really have the bomb and atack a city the blume is of USA and Europe for are ivading other countries
Click to expand...

An empire goes into a country and keeps it. That has never been America. We spend trillions of our dollars to defend and rebuild a country to try and make it better then it was. Even after a leader like Sadam had

1. 600 tons of uranium called mustard cake ready for a nuclear device or dirty bomb.

2. They did use chemical weapons on there people in the past. And had no reason to believe they wouldnt again when they wouldnt let inspectors in.

3. They did on a daily basis try to shoot down American planes even after the first surrender.

4. Sadam was the king of human violation rights killing and torturing millions.

5. He was paying terrorist families if a member of the family would kill a American or Isreali.

6. They found foreign terrorist training camps on Iraqi soil to Kill people across the globe and being funded by Sadam. And the list goes on.

Resistance fighters dont use there own people as shields. Resistance people dont force there religion on the people around them with fear tatics and random killings. There not resistance fighters they are thugs.

America was under no illusion who these people were when they trained them and never expected them to become there close friends if Russia failed. But I dont remember all of Europe complaining at the time when we were looking for any chance to weaken Russia before it spread further into Europe.

Yes were so bad we helped millions living in terror and stopped the torture and rape rooms. What were we thinking to give a people a chance to pursue the destiny they want for there country. If you believe we deserved it if a nuke went off you are no better then the terrorists.
 
ssvs04 said:
An empire goes into a country and keeps it. That has never been America.
Click to expand...

Oh yes, America had an imperialist phase as well. When the settlers arrived in America, they took all the land, and proceeded to try to kill off all the native people. Then, they imported people from Africa to serve as slaves. Thank god this was stopped a couple of centuries in, but there's no denying that America was an imperialist country too, once.

Of course, there's no need to be imperialist now, since you have all the land that you need.

There's still the question if the USA just wants to get control over Afghanistan and Iraq to get their hands on raw materials (esp. oil).

The Bush regime gave Halliburton lucrative contracts in the region, without following government contract procedure ...

So there's reason to believe, that at least the Bush regime had imperialist interests in the Middle East.

ssvs04 said:
Yes were so bad we helped millions living in terror and stopped the torture and rape rooms.
Click to expand...

Then you went ahead and built Guantanamo Bay explicitly for the purpose of torturing people, away from US soil. People were abducted and flown in from all over the world to be tortured.

As a result of the instability in Iraq, probably over a million people already died. We'll see for sure when there's a stable government and the first census.

But still, people in Iraq probably welcome the change, b/c it's better than the Saddam regime ... at least, once there's a proper government in place.

And why Iraq? There's still many dictatorships in Africa left undisturbed. Must've been the oil thing.

---------- Post added at 12:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:22 PM ----------
ssvs04 said:
If you believe we deserved it if a nuke went off you are no better then the terrorists.
Click to expand...

You mean like those bombs the US threw on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945? That killed millions? (Immediately or later on by residue radiation)
 
ssvs04 said:
An empire goes into a country and keeps it. That has never been America. We spend trillions of our dollars to defend and rebuild a country to try and make it better then it was. Even after a leader like Sadam had

1. 600 tons of uranium called mustard cake ready for a nuclear device or dirty bomb.

2. They did use chemical weapons on there people in the past. And had no reason to believe they wouldnt again when they wouldnt let inspectors in.

3. They did on a daily basis try to shoot down American planes even after the first surrender.

4. Sadam was the king of human violation rights killing and torturing millions.

5. He was paying terrorist families if a member of the family would kill a American or Isreali.

6. They found foreign terrorist training camps on Iraqi soil to Kill people across the globe and being funded by Sadam. And the list goes on.

Resistance fighters dont use there own people as shields. Resistance people dont force there religion on the people around them with fear tatics and random killings. There not resistance fighters they are thugs.

America was under no illusion who these people were when they trained them and never expected them to become there close friends if Russia failed. But I dont remember all of Europe complaining at the time when we were looking for any chance to weaken Russia before it spread further into Europe.

Yes were so bad we helped millions living in terror and stopped the torture and rape rooms. What were we thinking to give a people a chance to pursue the destiny they want for there country. If you believe we deserved it if a nuke went off you are no better then the terrorists.
Click to expand...

Yes yes an invasion in the name of the democracy and the human right
I see the good intensions of the american in Guantano and Abu ghrais all world saw the tortures of this prisions

USA and Europe doesn't invading to install a democracy invade for install their personal dictator
The history of the USA and Israel is based in the expansionism
The jews frustred and angry after Second World War choose a random territory and extermine at the habitants of the country chosed shielding behind the religion and reducing the plaestinian nation to minimal zone
If a religion comunity choose USA to found their new country and tell you: OK we are very kind and we give your California Nevada New Mexico Texas Arizona ¿What USA do? defender the nation and this is not terrorism is defender you country as the palestinian
USA also invaded other countries or regions for example Bay of Pigs or Irak and Afghanistan two satellite states of USA
 
Monster said:
Oh yes, America had an imperialist phase as well. When the settlers arrived in America, they took all the land, and proceeded to try to kill off all the native people. Then, they imported people from Africa to serve as slaves. Thank god this was stopped a couple of centuries in, but there's no denying that America was an imperialist country too, once.

Of course, there's no need to be imperialist now, since you have all the land that you need.

There's still the question if the USA just wants to get control over Afghanistan and Iraq to get their hands on raw materials (esp. oil).

The Bush regime gave Halliburton lucrative contracts in the region, without following government contract procedure ...

So there's reason to believe, that at least the Bush regime had imperialist interests in the Middle East.



Then you went ahead and built Guantanamo Bay explicitly for the purpose of torturing people, away from US soil. People were abducted and flown in from all over the world to be tortured.

As a result of the instability in Iraq, probably over a million people already died. We'll see for sure when there's a stable government and the first census.

But still, people in Iraq probably welcome the change, b/c it's better than the Saddam regime ... at least, once there's a proper government in place.

And why Iraq? There's still many dictatorships in Africa left undisturbed. Must've been the oil thing.

---------- Post added at 12:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:22 PM ----------



You mean like those bombs the US threw on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945? That killed millions? (Immediately or later on by residue radiation)
Click to expand...

Never said America was perfect. It was under British control when we were buying slaves. Soon after the signing of the constitition buying slaves in Africa began to quit.

Yes you know how those imperialists rebuild nations all the time. How do you know how land America needed after world war 2. We could have easily kept parts of Europe. We didnt because in general thats not America.

Find me any new country growing that has not had wars with its neighbors and spread its territory.

Please Bush failed at many things as president but give me a break with halliburton thing. Its really old and has no substance. There is no reason Bush wanted to setup a regime in the middle east. Again he wasnt the best president but his intentions were never to permanatly occupy another country.

Personally dont have a problem with waterboarding terrorists day and night to get info. And the prisoners living conditions were much better then the soldiers guarding these scum bags. Plus human rights people were going in day and night checking these scum bags. So we were not torturing them. Waterboarding and keeping people from sleeping is not torture. We use those techniques on our own soldiers for training.

Freedom is never comes easy. High human deaths is what happens when your fighting for your freedom and future generations. Its up to them now if they can keep the freedom we gave them.

We picked Iraq for the reason I mentioned above. Plus they had deadly chemical weapons and actually used them on there own people. You know America cant be everywhere to help the world. I sure dont Europe or any other country stepping up in big numbers to help other countries. Europe always screams for America to come and help when they are in trouble. And yes im sure oil was a factor also. The last time I check I need it to power my home and car.

You mean after the Japanese attacted the south pacific used chemical weapons on the chinese and killed without mercy everywhere they went and then attacked us first. And we had a chance to possibly save a hundred thousand American lives by using a bomb instead of bringing in troops to Japan. Then hell yes!

I typed this fast before leaving for work so excuse the mistakes.
 
Abu Grahib torture and prisoner abuse

Beginning in 2004, accounts of physical, psychological, and sexual abuse, including torture,[1][2] rape,[1] sodomy,[2] and homicide[3] of prisoners held in the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq (also known as Baghdad Correctional Facility) came to public attention. These acts were committed by military police personnel of the United States Army together with additional US governmental agencies.[4]
Click to expand...


---------- Post added at 02:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:55 PM ----------

War crimes committed by the United States

The International Criminal Court and the 2003 invasion of Iraq

---------- Post added at 02:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:06 PM ----------

Torture and the United States

---------- Post added at 02:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:07 PM ----------

Halliburton

---------- Post added at 02:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:13 PM ----------

Nuremberg Principles
 
You and wikipedia again. Sorry not a source I will even comment on except the international courts one was quite funny to read.
 
Enza said:
Yes yes an invasion in the name of the democracy and the human right
I see the good intensions of the american in Guantano and Abu ghrais all world saw the tortures of this prisions

USA and Europe doesn't invading to install a democracy invade for install their personal dictator
The history of the USA and Israel is based in the expansionism
The jews frustred and angry after Second World War choose a random territory and extermine at the habitants of the country chosed shielding behind the religion and reducing the plaestinian nation to minimal zone
If a religion comunity choose USA to found their new country and tell you: OK we are very kind and we give your California Nevada New Mexico Texas Arizona ¿What USA do? defender the nation and this is not terrorism is defender you country as the palestinian
USA also invaded other countries or regions for example Bay of Pigs or Irak and Afghanistan two satellite states of USA
Click to expand...

And what personal dictator have we installed in Iraq since the people have had a election to choose there own leader. Just a silly comment.

Plaestinians are Syrians who left them behind after the Isreali war. They never had a nation. Here is a simple little history lesson for you to understand.



The rest im sorry just dont quite understand what your writing.

---------- Post added at 04:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:13 PM ----------
Monster said:
****, how far removed from reality are you guys?
Click to expand...

Not as far removed as the joke that calls themselves the international court. They have been a joke for some time but that just takes the cake.
 
A dictator for other dictator the same oppression
USA support the dictators, the dictator with politicaly afinity to USA
In cuba USA support the dicatorship of Fulgencio Batista (1952-1959)
Israel is a imperialist state likes the war because ever have the support of dady USA
This videos is false is a indoctrination a facotry of americans idiots

I also sorry that you understand me in the last reply my english level is medium

Goodbye
 
It's hard to find neutral assessments of Israel's history.

The Foundation of the Israel Nation (interactive Flash site, German)

First part of an interesting Egyptian documentary (with English subtitles) -- it does have some Egyptian bias but seems to be fairly accurate about historic events:

First part of an interesting British documentary:

I'm sure there's more documentaries that can be found online that are fairly neutral, but it's difficult b/c any party might have interest in spreading a particular view about the events.

---------- Post added at 11:15 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:39 AM ----------

Here's the token Wikipedia article about the History of Israel
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top