DJCC said:Yep, KJ Florida now has a couple of days off.
KjFlorida said:-----Original Message-----
From: Our KJ Talk - Karaoke Host Talk [mailto:webmaster@ourkjtalk.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2011 12:06 AM
To: Kurt Slep
Subject: "Questions about the Arizona Suits" update
Dear Sound Choice,
You are subscribed to the thread "Questions about the Arizona Suits" by KjAthena, there have been 13 post(s) to this thread, the last poster
was c. staley.
http://ourkjtalk.com/threads/1269-Questions-about-the-Arizona-Suits
These following posts were made to the thread:
************
Re: Questions about the Arizona Suits
http://ourkjtalk.com/threads/1269-Questions-about-the-Arizona-Suits#post33925
Posted by: JoeChartreuse
On: 02-11-2011 03:32 AM
---Quote (Originally by JoeChartreuse)---
....And what about #1- demanding licensing fees for tracks that SC has no licensing for ( illegally distributed in the U.S.?)
---End Quote---
Diafel said:Am I the only one that caught this???
It appears to be a notification email TO Sound Choice about thread updates that's been posted in the thread.
Now how do you suppose that KjFlorida got hold of that? Unless I TOTALLY missed something somewhere, I can't seem to find a post where Soound Choice posted it to the board. Anyone else have any ideas?
Big Dan said:That is definitely strange. I can tell you that the body looks legit the To: field isn't right. I can also tell you that Kurt and KJFL's IP addresses are from two totally different areas.
Agreed but it's awful hard to spoof the IP to be the same as one of our members.Diafel said:Not hard to spoof an IP.....but very strange, indeed!
c. staley said:Well, you can decide for yourself below:
The MCPS license agreement (the U.K. licensing guys) has a complicated licensing agreement, but let's simplify this by looking at what exactly they are calling within their scope of "territory.":
Okay, so far it sounds like the U.S. is in fact, NOT part of their "territory."
So let's look at clause 3.14 that is mentioned above:
So, let the speculation begin.....
Just in case you were wondering if clause 4.3 changes anything:
Here's 7.8:
and here's 3.16:
starzkj said:Can you point out where you were able to find a copy of that agreement. I would be very interested in reading it!
KjAthena said:OK everybody I am here to admit that this whole snafu was MY FAULT.... I can assure you that KJFLORIDA is not Kurt. I forwarded alot of info from many sources to KJFlorida asking him to answer 2 points...I included alot of background and copies and emails from at least 3 people. My thought was that his more business like phrasing was called for.Unfortunatley he is not very familar with chat boards and procedures.....so he accidentally posted the background info with his answer.....I am certain he will apologize personally when his ban is lifted......he has nothing against JoeC or anyone else....I again apologize to anyone who was offended. I hope that we can move beyond this and get back to our usual debates
c. staley said:Well, you can decide for yourself below:
The MCPS license agreement (the U.K. licensing guys) has a complicated licensing agreement, but let's simplify this by looking at what exactly they are calling within their scope of "territory.":
Okay, so far it sounds like the U.S. is in fact, NOT part of their "territory."
So let's look at clause 3.14 that is mentioned above:
So, let the speculation begin.....
Just in case you were wondering if clause 4.3 changes anything:
Here's 7.8:
and here's 3.16:
Diafel said:Maybe in the future it might be better to let others read the boards for themselves.... Just my own thoughts on this.
A place to debate everything and anything!