c. staley said:
No he didn't:
Posted by Kurt Slep:
Why not have Kurt post the agreement?
Chip when I am wrong...and it does happen I admit my errors. In this case please see the
following posts BY Ernie....I have changed to RED the statements in question... I think these
prove you are wrong and support my statements
1/29/201 at 9:26 am 01erniemac posted
Re: Questions about the Arizona Suits
I am sure if anyone would call Mr. Harrington and ask if he is still on the case, he would
say yes. because I have done it in the past. I asked him because little things he did or failed
to do told me otherwise. Perhaps he is a busy man and time is money. I just find it strange that
shortly after my last batch of posts, I was upset because I could not legally pick up a new
venue called "Fuzzy's" because my 2nd set of CDG-s was 2 months late. I came here to find
Mr. Slep to inquire about the late shipment. He told me in a personal e-mail that they were
shipped to his private Detective here in Phoenix and he was suppose to contact me and hold
the disks (hostage) until I disclosed or (Coughed Up) the locations of my venues so he could
inspect and see that each venue had the original disks in compliance with the settlement terms.
Mr. Slep did not think I would want to meet with his detective or cooperate with him because he
was the same person who originally served me for the lawsuit (1 day before it was to expire).
According to the personal e-mail, Mr. Slep wanted to "entice" me to meet with the detective so
he sent the disks to him instead. According to the detective on the phone, Mr. Slep also sent
copies of our statements from this web-site to keep a record of everything I tell you good people
. If you go back and read Mr.Slep's responses to my inquiries about the missing disks, he comes
off as bewildered and unknowing to all of you but he knew exactly what he was doing.
I responded back explaining I had no desire to meet with his detective and according to the
terms of the settlement, the disks were to be shipped directly to me. In other words, if he did
not get me the disks in a timely manor, I could have submitted another Motion To Dismiss for
violation of the Settlement Agreement, (which I thought was in place and waiting final approval
from the judge). The next weekend
I received an e-mail from Mr. Slep saying he was in Phoenix
and I could meet with him in person to receive the disks. At first I agreed but I later thought
it was extremely unusual for the Plaintiff and Defendant to meet while he was suppose to be
represented by council Mr. James Harrington. At 2 AM I wrote an e-mail to Mr. Slep explaining
this issue. I was advised from an attorney friend of mine not to meet with him at 9 AM the next
morning. At 7AM, I received a lengthy voice mail from Mr. Harrington telling me to go ahead and
meet with his client Mr. Slep to resolve our issues. I found this as highly irregular for an
attorney to give the green light for me to meet with his client without his council being
present
1/26/20011 at 9:26 AM 01erniemac posted
Sorry but no, Joe is right as usual. I paid 4 payment of $500 towards a $51,000 settlement.
I also paid $3,000 (or 2 payments of $1,500) for 2 sets of their CDG-s so I could expand my
operations and create 2 new systems to increase my income and offset the monthly $500 payment
for the next 8 years. I was to become a "Worker Bee" for SC generating income for 8 years.
The economy here in Arizona is terrible and most venues now are scared to death of Karaoke
because of these lawsuits. I tried getting new shows but out of 106 attempts, nobody was
interested in karaoke or they didn't want to pay over $100 per show. My hosts make $75 per show.
A few have offered to go down to $60. Perhaps now I can tell perspective venue owners not to
worry because I have "Been there, Done that". I still have to compete with piracy and the larger
companies that are loyal to SC. I'm not making too many friends these days and my business
reputation and name are thoroughly trashed. I'm certain Mr. Slep is unhappy with me and I
expect his big lapdogs are getting there instructions on how to make my life even more unpleasant
.
On a positive note; Given that SC was charging other defendants $6,500 for each set of
CDG-s, I ended up ahead paying $3,000 for 2 sets that normally would cost $13,000.
. Because of this and and the failure of Mr. Harrington to respond to a Federal Judge to show good cause why my Motion to Dismiss shouldn't be granted after 10 days, I can't help but wonder if he is still on the case of all these lawsuits nation-wide. Is Mr. Slep looking for another attorney to take on this heavy load on a contingency bases?
No, I do not want or need a microphone, I simply feel that if there is 1 person out there falsely accused and going through Hell, I write this to offer a small ray of hope that this legal nightmare will hopefully come to an end for all of us.
Last edited by 01erniemac; 01-29-2011 at 09:37 AM.
as far as why I do not ask Mr. Kurt Slep to post the agreement...I have answered that in a prior post but will restate for you. Ernie is the one that keeps reffering to the agreement and asking all of us here to believe his interpritation of what it says. If he were to post it here for all to see the issues would be in black and white.
I have empathy for Ernie, it is my opinion that he is showing a extreme lack of knowledge.....as I have stated before I think he is his own worst enemy