Now we're talking "speculation" here folks....
First of all, whether or not this case can be brought back up is entirely up to the resulting order issued by the court - not by the motion that was submitted to the court. So, unless someone has a copy of the ORDER, (not just the motion) then it's still up in the air.
Second, based on #1 above, it is impossible to know whether or not SC actually "lost" anything. IMHO, if the facts bear out that SC used intimidation to force a settlement after the case was dismissed by the court, then their dishonesty is only overshadowed by their vindictiveness.
Third, as for Ernie's role in all of this, I find it somewhat irresponsible to NOT know that your own case had been dismissed based on your own motion (if that was the case) for over 2 months. Often in cases like this, a motion is filed and a settlement reached before the court rules. The resulting order is a "stipulated order" (and "agreed to order") that would specify whether or not the case is dismissed "without prejudice" (can be refiled) or "with prejudice" (dead forever).
However, if the case was dismissed based on the motion that Ernie has provided us here, then SC cannot simply bring back this case without first submitting a motion of their own to do so that the court would to rule on. It would not be an automatic gimme by any means, SC would have to do some pretty fancy footwork to get around their failure to respond earlier.
And there are some informational holes here that need to be filled.
So, the information submitted here would certainly make it look like SC "lost the case" when in fact, it's all dependent on the language in the final order - not just the motion - and until we have that, it's all still speculation.
I would ask Ernie to either provide a link to the final order or a pdf of the order itself. I wouldn't expect SC to do anything.