Mantis1 said:Ahhh Clarity!!!!
Guess again...
Mantis1 said:Ahhh Clarity!!!!
Mantis1 said:Baiting?:wubpill:
Mantis1 said:Nice try???? I thought it was lame! Just didn't feel like replying at the time.
The fact that you can not see "clarity" in true definitions of term (s) you used, say alot about you!
Wow!
Mantis1 said:I can read!!!
What is Your definition of QPQ?
Grudge sure makes ALOT more sense!!!!
Mantis1 said:Wow !!!! REALLY????
Slow down man!!!!!
What is YOUR ( you - Chip Staley) definition of qpq?
From what I can tell, someone did a FAVOR for/to you and you want to return the FAVOR ????? How nice of you!!!!!
Please explain, so we can all understand YOUR actions when it comes to why you are on YOUR side of these issues!!!!
A favor is nice, is it not????
Reading and comprehension go hand in hand. If we are gonna use the same laguage, don't you think we should have a similiar definition of common words/ terms???? No ????
I mean we do have dictionaries for a reason!!!!
Holding a grudge isn't good for your health or your heart.. But you can certainly have ( keep) yours.
Mantis1 said:Please explain, so we can all understand YOUR actions when it comes to why you are on YOUR side of these issues!!!!
You debate and argue REALLY well. But you don't communicate at all!:huhpill:
Mantis1 said:Ok Chip, Just keep in mind that there are three sides every story. Not tryin to debate. Tryin to understand.
We KNOW there are reasons!!!
Sound Choice said:Ernie,
You just can’t seem to keep your mouth closed sometimes. You are your own worst enemy. I am trying to prepare for the Mobile Beat show, but you have forced me to waste my time dealing with you. For all of you sitting on the edges of your seats hoping that Ernie is correct, you will be disappointed. For those ROTFL at Ernie as he appears more and more stupid, you will probably feel edified in knowing the WHOLE TRUTH:
5/21/10 – While we are negotiating a settlement, McCullar files a motion to dismiss and an answer, which he does not serve on us as required by the rules.
5/24/10 - We get an e-mail copy of what he filed because of the clerk's entry of it onto the record.
5/26/10 - McCullar agrees to settle.
5/28/10 - McCullar signs the settlement agreement
6/1/10 – Kurt Slep signs the settlement agreement. We didn't respond to the motion to dismiss because his settlement made it moot.
However, Ernie did not sign the stipulation of dismissal that was required by the settlement agreement, so we couldn't file the dismissal, so due to his fault, it was left “open”.
10/26/10 - The judge issued a "show cause" order, saying she would dismiss the suit against McCuller if we didn't respond to the dismissal motion. However, we didn't receive the order (it was issued only through e-mail, and we didn't get it). If we had received it, we would have filed the notice of voluntary dismissal immediately.
11/17/10 - The judge issued a new order dismissing the case against McCuller. That one, we received. Harrington immediately filed a document notifying the court that we hadn't received the original show cause order and stating that our position would have been to dismiss the case anyway, even if we had received it. Because the net effect was the same, there was nothing more to do.
Now, at that point, the case was over except for the formality of dismissal. In light of the information revealed by Ernie regarding “dismissal with prejudice”, we will notify the court that the dismissal was WITHOUT prejudice just so they have that on record.
The bottom line is that we have a valid settlement agreement that predated any action by the court and the court will not over-ride that. And Ernie McCuller is in default of that agreement and ultimately will not be getting two sets of discs for $3000.
As for his other comments about our business plans, I won’t comment except to say that he is wrong again, just as he has been proven time and again with his previous off the mark assumptions and speculations.
I'll be attending Mobile Beat Las Vegas and will not be logging in again.
For those that are interested, we (Chartbuster, Sound Choice and Stellar Records) are putting on a seminar that will be videotaped and made available later. If any of you are going to be going to MB, come by and say hello.
Wednesday, Feb.2 1:00 – 1:45 PM Capri 102
How to Survive and Even Thrive in a Karaoke Market Fraught With Pirates - KIAA (Karaoke Industry Alliance of America)
Are you losing shows to pirates with illegal music systems? Is the “playing field” in your market skewed by illegal, unfair competition? There is hope on the horizon! KIAA members Sound Choice, Chartbuster and Stellar Records will present a summary of their anti-piracy activities, provide you with tools to combat the pirates, explain how to get legal if you are not and discuss the requirements and benefits of being a KIAA member.
While it was his mistake not to serve you, it certainly doesn't take two brain cells to rub together to go and ASK for a copy when you saw it had been filed.Sound Choice said:Ernie,
You just can’t seem to keep your mouth closed sometimes. You are your own worst enemy. I am trying to prepare for the Mobile Beat show, but you have forced me to waste my time dealing with you. For all of you sitting on the edges of your seats hoping that Ernie is correct, you will be disappointed. For those ROTFL at Ernie as he appears more and more stupid, you will probably feel edified in knowing the WHOLE TRUTH:
5/21/10 – While we are negotiating a settlement, McCullar files a motion to dismiss and an answer, which he does not serve on us as required by the rules.
5/24/10 - We get an e-mail copy of what he filed because of the clerk's entry of it onto the record.
5/26/10 - McCullar agrees to settle.
5/28/10 - McCullar signs the settlement agreement
6/1/10 – Kurt Slep signs the settlement agreement. We didn't respond to the motion to dismiss because his settlement made it moot.
However, Ernie did not sign the stipulation of dismissal that was required by the settlement agreement, so we couldn't file the dismissal, so due to his fault, it was left “open”.
10/26/10 - The judge issued a "show cause" order, saying she would dismiss the suit against McCuller if we didn't respond to the dismissal motion. However, we didn't receive the order (it was issued only through e-mail, and we didn't get it). If we had received it, we would have filed the notice of voluntary dismissal immediately.
11/17/10 - The judge issued a new order dismissing the case against McCuller. That one, we received. Harrington immediately filed a document notifying the court that we hadn't received the original show cause order and stating that our position would have been to dismiss the case anyway, even if we had received it. Because the net effect was the same, there was nothing more to do.
A place to debate everything and anything!