G
Guest
Guest
Joe,
No one holds any animosity towards you, but the absolutes that you take with your positions give most cause to believe that you are defending those that would involve themselves in piracy.
When you constantly argue against any actions taken and/or the results those actions are having, it gives rise to the thought that either you are lost in a world of your own or involved in the act yourself.
I know, you don't believe that is what you are doing, but in the areas that Sound Choice has filed suits against pirates the retoric that you are putting forward is exactly what we see from them.
You were honestly invited to the meeting and you could have met face to face with everyone there it was your choice not to come. Had you been there you would have been part of the discusion just as each and everyone of us were. And yes we did discuss each of our positions on piracy, to be perfectly honest many simply don't know what your position is on the subject.
Had you been there you would have had the whole story on many of the discontinued disc instead of the conjecture you have from others.
I am sorry if my being honest with you hurt your feelings, but you chose to make it public, I did do it through a PM between me and you. But there was a reason for it, the fact that you were complaining to the moderators trying to get me banned had a very large part in my reaction, I never took well to those that run to the teacher saying "look what that mean boy did to me"! The "non sequitur" you keep responding to me with was also part of it. If you want to debate a topic without trying to talk down to me then I have no problem with it, but when you or anyone else does then I will react in a manner that you may not like. You also keep talking about your IP attorney as if he was the answer to all of this, but you don't seem to realize that for every attorney that is correct there is one that is wrong.
No one holds any animosity towards you, but the absolutes that you take with your positions give most cause to believe that you are defending those that would involve themselves in piracy.
When you constantly argue against any actions taken and/or the results those actions are having, it gives rise to the thought that either you are lost in a world of your own or involved in the act yourself.
I know, you don't believe that is what you are doing, but in the areas that Sound Choice has filed suits against pirates the retoric that you are putting forward is exactly what we see from them.
You were honestly invited to the meeting and you could have met face to face with everyone there it was your choice not to come. Had you been there you would have been part of the discusion just as each and everyone of us were. And yes we did discuss each of our positions on piracy, to be perfectly honest many simply don't know what your position is on the subject.
Had you been there you would have had the whole story on many of the discontinued disc instead of the conjecture you have from others.
I am sorry if my being honest with you hurt your feelings, but you chose to make it public, I did do it through a PM between me and you. But there was a reason for it, the fact that you were complaining to the moderators trying to get me banned had a very large part in my reaction, I never took well to those that run to the teacher saying "look what that mean boy did to me"! The "non sequitur" you keep responding to me with was also part of it. If you want to debate a topic without trying to talk down to me then I have no problem with it, but when you or anyone else does then I will react in a manner that you may not like. You also keep talking about your IP attorney as if he was the answer to all of this, but you don't seem to realize that for every attorney that is correct there is one that is wrong.