I have entirely to much **** to do.
Ennui, You would be surprised what the government considers neglect to be.
And Icou, I do heart you but if there is $ for gas in the car, there is a couple bux for a coat at GW. If THEY are wearing coats, their kid should have a coat. It is all about priorities.
I honestly think people want their kids kept inside out of some kind of medieval belief that sickness still comes from cold weather and not germs. My 13yo is still having outdoor soccer practice and will do so all winter as long as it is above 20 degrees or so. Cold weather is not bad for people.
I don't understand how not having a coat for cold weather wouldn't be considered neglect, same for a child without shoes or boots for snow.Ennui, You would be surprised what the government considers neglect to be.
And Icou, I do heart you but if there is $ for gas in the car, there is a couple bux for a coat at GW. If THEY are wearing coats, their kid should have a coat. It is all about priorities.
I honestly think people want their kids kept inside out of some kind of medieval belief that sickness still comes from cold weather and not germs. My 13yo is still having outdoor soccer practice and will do so all winter as long as it is above 20 degrees or so. Cold weather is not bad for people.
I don't understand how not having a coat for cold weather wouldn't be considered neglect, same for a child without shoes or boots for snow.
I agree, if the parents have coats they can certainly get a coat for their child.
Cold weather, or more specifically cold air, may be harmful if the child has cold triggered asthma. However there are meds that used as pre-treatment prevent cold triggered asthma attacks or the asthmatic can wear a mask to warm up the cold inhaled air.
I think you are wrong about this one. Just because they are in daycare doesn't mean the are rolling in $$$. I'm pretty sure that Lauri doesn't work in a Montessori school or something like that.
Elk Grove has their EG Township daycare center...sliding scale or even free in some cases. Those kids are in daycare but in my experience there are several who can't afford those kinds of basic necessities.
I thought it subsidized based on income daycare. My bad :hides:If they can afford many hundreds of $$ for daycare, they can probably afford a coat from GW.
People's priorities are seriously messed up right now.
I thought it subsidized based on income daycare. My bad :hides:
I didn't say anyone was rolling in $.
And your average everyday daycare is a coupla hundred a week, unless you get subsidized or whatever.
In any case, my point is people make the $ available for what they want to, but something like this they feel justified in letting slide. I was just commisserating with Lauri's frustration. I used to do before/after school from my house, the parents were horrid and I give anyone who does child care the HIGHEST of kudos.
Just curious, if it is a DCFS requirement that kids go out to get fresh air as long as it's above freezing, what are the requirements about parents not bringing children to daycare properly attired?
No penalty against the parents at all?
Do daycare centers have to suck it up and repeatedly provide what the parents refuse?
Can the centers refuse to take the child for the day?
Time for more popcorn :35:
If a child has the proper clothing at home, but the parents repeatedly bring the child without proper attire, i.e. winter coat, there should be a point at which the center should be able to tell the parents that "sorry, we won't be taking care of 'Joey' today or tomorrow until he arrived appropriately dressed". Then quickly usher them back outside.I will answer the best I can...
First, before the child starts they are told the requirements. Also given them in writting as a part of the enrollment package. If a family is unable to provide we refer them to local free clothing organizations...there are lots of them in our area. Never known a child to be turned down for a need.
We can refuse to take a child for many reasons.
A place to debate everything and anything!